描述
5SHY3545L0014 過程控制與通信控制西門子是強項
過程控制與通信控制西門子是強項,西門子的模擬量模塊價格便宜,程序簡單,而三菱的模擬量模塊價格昂貴,程序復雜,西門子做通信也容易,程序簡單,三菱在這塊功能較弱。所以針對不同的設備不同的控制方式,我們要合理的選用PLC,用其長處,避其短處。例如某設備只是些動作控制,如機械手,可選擇三菱的PLC,某設備有伺服或步進要進行定位控制,也選三菱的PLC;像中央空調,污水處理,溫度控制等這類有很多模擬量要處理的就要選西門子的PLC比較合適,某設備現(xiàn)場有很多儀表的數(shù)據(jù)要用通信進行采集,選西門子的好控制。區(qū)別非常大的.芯片肯定是有所不同的(體現(xiàn)在容量和運算速度上)但最大的區(qū)別還是體現(xiàn)在編程軟件的思路和結構上
個人認為三菱(日系的中高端品牌)PLC的軟件至少落后西門子5年以上。大中型的暫且不說,就拿三菱比較有優(yōu)勢的小型機FX系列和西門子S7-200系列對比
1、三菱的編程軟件從早期的FXGPWIN到近期的GX8.0(我所知道最新的),和所有的日系品牌一樣,該軟件的編程思路是自上而下的單一縱向結構,而西門子的MicroWIN則是縱向和橫向兼?zhèn)涞慕Y構,而且子程序支持局部變量,相同的功能只需要編一次程序即可,大大減少了開發(fā)難度和時間。
2、S7-200一直以來支持強大的浮點運算,編程軟件直接支持小數(shù)點輸入輸出,而三菱直至近年推出的FX3U系列才有此種功能,以前的FX2N系列的浮點功能都是假的。
3、S7-200的模擬量輸入輸出程序非常簡單方便,AD、DA值可以不需編程直接存取的,三菱的FX2N及其以前的系列都需要非常繁瑣的FROMTO指令。FX3U如今倒支持此功能了,但足足晚了五年甚至更多。
4、CPU226和CPU224XP,標準配置2個485口即PPI口,最大通訊速度187.5K,三菱FX3U之前的所有系列都是一個可憐的422口,而且速度是9.6K。如果需要連個智能儀表什么的則必須另購FX2N0-485BD等特殊模塊。
5、CPU226的程序容量20K,數(shù)據(jù)容量14K,FX2N總共才8K.后來的3U倒是有所改進
但三菱的FX2N系列有兩個優(yōu)勢,一是高速計數(shù)器指令比S7-200方便。二是422口比西門子的PPI口皮實(因為200系列的PPI口是非光電隔離的,非規(guī)范操作和
仿制的編程電纜可能會導致串口損壞)西門子最近推出的S7-1200系列直接支持以太網(wǎng)接口,而且由于集成了計數(shù)和測量、閉環(huán)控制和運動控制的工藝,因此FX3U再次被西門子遠遠超越以上的比較僅僅是小型機。至于西門子的300和400系列以及更大型的TDC系列,這里就無需多言了,一句話,誰用誰知道。西門子的PCS7軟件絕對是博大精深的,所有的日系品牌都只能望其項背。
學PLC,三菱是很容易上手的,因為直來直去思路簡單。從學習的角度講,肯定是西門子更好。還是那句話,用了PCS7,才知道日系的軟件是垃圾。
還有西門子PLC的通信口有兩個,三菱的有一個,兩個通信口可以一個連接下載數(shù)據(jù)線一個連接觸摸屏進行調試程序,否則你就要拔下觸摸屏數(shù)據(jù)線再連接觸摸屏數(shù)據(jù)線來回調整程序非常麻煩。
5SHY3545L0014 過程控制與通信控制西門子是強項
Process control and communication control Siemens is the strong point, Siemens analog module is cheap, the program is simple, and Mitsubishi analog module is expensive, the program is complex, Siemens communication is also easy, the program is simple, Mitsubishi is weak in this function. Therefore, for different equipment and different control methods, we should reasonably choose PLC, use its strengths and avoid its weaknesses. For example, a device is only some action control, such as a manipulator, you can choose Mitsubishi PLC, a device has servo or step to position control, you can also choose Mitsubishi PLC; Like central air conditioning, sewage treatment, temperature control and so on, there are a lot of analog quantities to deal with, it is more appropriate to choose Siemens PLC, a lot of instrument data on the site to be collected by communication, choose Siemens good control. The chips are definitely different (in terms of capacity and speed) but the biggest difference is in the way the software is programmed and structured
I personally believe that the software of Mitsubishi PLC is at least 5 years behind that of Siemens. Large and medium-sized for the time being, take the advantage of Mitsubishi’s minicompanies FX series and Siemens S7-200 series contrast
1. Mitsubishi’s programming software from the early FXGPWIN to the recent GX8.0(the latest one I know), like all Japanese brands, the programming idea of this software is a top-down single vertical structure, while Siemens’ MicroWIN is both vertical and horizontal structure, and the subroutine supports local variables. The same function only needs to be programmed once, which greatly reduces the difficulty and time of development.
2, S7-200 has always supported a strong floating point operation, programming software directly supports the decimal point input and output, and Mitsubishi until the FX3U series launched in recent years to have this function, the floating point function of the previous FX2N series is fake.
3, the S7-200 analog input and output program is very simple and convenient, AD, DA values can be directly accessed without programming, Mitsubishi FX2N and its previous series require very cumbersome FROMTO instructions. FX3U now supports this feature, but five years or more later.
4, CPU226 and CPU224XP, the standard configuration of two 485 ports that is PPI port, the maximum communication speed of 187.5K, Mitsubishi FX3U before all series are a poor 422 ports, and the speed is 9.6K. If you need to connect a smart instrument, you must buy special modules such as FX2N0-485BD.
5, CPU226 program capacity 20K, data capacity 14K,FX2N a total of 8K. The later 3U was an improvement
But Mitsubishi’s FX2N series has two advantages, one is that the high-speed counter instruction is more convenient than the S7-200. The second is 422 more than the Siemens PPI mouth (because the 200 series PPI mouth is non-photoelectric isolation, non-standard operation and
The recently introduced S7-1200 series from Siemens directly supports Ethernet interfaces, and thanks to the integration of counting and measurement, closed-loop control, and motion control processes, the FX3U is once again far exceeded by Siemens by the above comparison of just minicommitters. As for the Siemens 300 and 400 series and the larger TDC series, there is no need to say more here, in a word, who uses who knows. Siemens’ PCS7 software is absolutely extensive and profound, and all Japanese brands can only look behind it.
Learning PLC, Mitsubishi is very easy to get started, because straight thinking is simple. From a learning point of view, Siemens is definitely better. Still the same sentence, using PCS7, just know that the Japanese software is junk.
There are also two communication ports of Siemens PLC, Mitsubishi has one, the two communication ports can be connected to download a data line and a touch screen to debug the program, otherwise you have to unplug the touch screen data line and then connect the touch screen data line to adjust the program is very troublesome.
公司介紹:成都陽光不斷創(chuàng)新致力于提升停產(chǎn)的自動化零件供應水平,無論客戶身處何地,無論所需配件多么稀有,我們總能將客戶與所需產(chǎn)品緊密連接 ,成都陽光零部件覆蓋廣泛。
急切需要自動化或控制零件? 全新、Used和已停產(chǎn)的自動化機械零件的全球供應商。
客戶支持快速響應
合作伙伴網(wǎng)絡橫跨各個大洲
全球合作伙伴網(wǎng)絡
Company Introduction:
Chengdu Sunshine Xihe Co., Ltd. specializes in one-stop procurement consulting for imported industrial spare parts, offering original equipment and professional discontinued parts services. We are committed to providing efficient and reliable automation solutions for our customers. Customer support fast responseThe network of partners spans all continentsGlobal partner networkAlways achieve more delivery, be it parts, service or speed
始終實現(xiàn)更多的交付,無論是零件、服務還是速度